We are building EduLadder(ELADR) - Protocol

The Eladr Protocol is a decentralized, security and efficiency enhanced Web3 noSQL database powered by IPFS as the data storage layer https://ipfs.io/, and the Cardano block chain as the rewards token platform, https://cardano.org/. It provides a JSON based, IPFS layer 2 solution for data indexing and retrieval in an 'append only' file system built with open source Node.js API libraries.

The ELADR token was designed to incentivize and reward community members as a proof of contribution. Token holders are also granted access to EduLadder.com premium features as well as associated ELADR token enabled apps.

WHITE PAPER Buy Now Try BETA

Real Problems! Real Experts!

Join Our Telegram Channel !


The Eduladder is a community of students, teachers, and programmers. We help you to solve your academic and programming questions fast.
In eduladder you can Ask,Answer,Listen,Earn and Download Questions and Question papers.
Watch related videos of your favorite subject.
Connect with students from different parts of the world.
Apply or Post Jobs, Courses ,Internships and Volunteering opportunity. For FREE
See Our team
Wondering how we keep quality?
Got unsolved questions? Ask Questions


You are here:Open notes-->VTU-->SYSTEM-SOFTWARE-10CS52-Unit-8

SYSTEM SOFTWARE [10CS52] Unit-8

UNIT - 8 LEX AND YACC -2


8.1 USING YACC
Yacc provides a general tool for describing the input to a computer program. The Yacc user
specifies the structures of his input, together with code to be invoked as each such structure is
recognized. Yacc turns such a specification into a subroutine that handles the input process;
frequently, it is convenient and appropriate to have most of the flow of control in the user's
application handled by this subroutine.
The input subroutine produced by Yacc calls a user-supplied routine to return the next
basic input item. Thus, the user can specify his input in terms of individual input characters
or in terms of higher level constructs such as names and numbers. The user supplied routine
may also handle idiomatic features such as comment and continuation conventions, which
typically defy easy grammatical specification. Yacc is written in portable C.
Yacc provides a general tool for imposing structure on the input to a computer
program. User prepares a specification of the input process; this includes rules describing the
input structure, code to be invoked when these rules are recognized, and a low-level routine
to do the basic input.
Grammars:
The heart of the input specification is a collection of grammar rules. Each rule
describes an allowable structure and gives it a name. For example, one grammar rule might
be
date : month_name day ',' year
Here, date, month_name, day, and year represent structures of interest in the input
process; presumably, month_name, day, and year are defined elsewhere. The comma ``,'' is

 
enclosed in single quotes; this implies that the comma is to appear literally in the input. The
colon and semicolon merely serve as punctuation in the rule, and have no significance in
controlling the input. Thus, with proper definitions, the input
July 4, 1776
might be matched by the above rule.
An important part of the input process is carried out by the lexical analyzer. This
user routine reads the input stream, recognizing the lower level structures, and communicates
these tokens to the parser. For historical reasons, a structure recognized by the lexical
analyzer is called a terminal symbol, while the structure recognized by the parser is called a
nonterminal symbol. To avoid confusion, terminal symbols will usually be referred to as
tokens.
Basic Specifications:
Every specification file consists of three sections: the declarations, (grammar) rules,
and programs. The sections are separated by double percent ``%%'' marks. (The percent
``%'' is generally used in Yacc specifications as an escape character.)
In other words, a full specification file looks like
declarations
%%
rules
%%
programs
The declaration section may be empty. Moreover, if the programs section is omitted, the
second %% mark may be omitted also; thus, the smallest legal Yacc specification is
%%
 
rules
Blanks, tabs, and newlines are ignored except that they may not appear in names or
multi-character reserved symbols. Comments may appear wherever a name is legal; they are
enclosed in /* . . . */, as in C and PL/I.
The rules section is made up of one or more grammar rules.
A grammar rule has the form:
A:BODY;
A represents a non terminal name, and BODY represents a sequence of zero or more
names and literals. The colon and the semicolon are Yacc punctuation. Names may be of
arbitrary length, and may be made up of letters, dot ``.'', underscore ``_'', and non-initial
digits. Upper and lower case letters are distinct. The names used in the body of a grammar
rule may represent tokens or nonterminal symbols.
8.2 AYACC PARSER
A literal consists of a character enclosed in single quotes ``'''. As in C, the backslash ``\'' is
an escape character within literals, and all the C escapes are recognized. Thus
'\n' newline
'\r' return
'\'' single quote ``'''
'\\' backslash ``\''
'\t' tab
'\b' backspace
'\f' form feed
'\xxx' ``xxx'' in octal
 
For a number of technical reasons, the NUL character ('\0' or 0) should never be used in
grammar rules.
If there are several grammar rules with the same left hand side, the vertical bar ``|''
can be used to avoid rewriting the left hand side. In addition, the semicolon at the end of a
rule can be dropped before a vertical bar. Thus the grammar rules
A : B C D ;
A : E F ;
A : G ;
can be given to Yacc as
A : B C D
| E F
| G
;
? It is not necessary that all grammar rules with the same left side appear together in
the grammar rules section, although it makes the input much more readable, and
easier to change.
? If a nonterminal symbol matches the empty string, this can be indicated in the
obvious way:
? empty : ;
? Names representing tokens must be declared; this is most simply done by writing
? %token name1, name2 . . .
In the declarations section, Every name not defined in the declarations section is
assumed to represent a non-terminal symbol. Every non-terminal symbol must appear on
the left side of at least one rule.
 
? Of all the nonterminal symbols, one, called the start symbol, has particular
importance. The parser is designed to recognize the start symbol; thus, this symbol
represents the largest, most general structure described by the grammar rules. By
default, the start symbol is taken to be the left hand side of the first grammar rule in
the rules section.
? It is possible, and in fact desirable, to declare the start symbol explicitly in the
declarations section using the % start keyword:
? %start symbol
? The end of the input to the parser is signaled by a special token, called the endmarker.
If the tokens up to, but not including, the endmarker form a structure which matches
the start symbol, the parser function returns to its caller after the end-marker is seen;
it accepts the input. If the endmarker is seen in any other context, it is an error.
? It is the job of the user-supplied lexical analyzer to return the endmarker when
appropriate; see section 3, below. Usually the endmarker represents some reasonably
obvious I/O status, such as ``end-of-file'' or ``end-of-record''.
Actions:
? With each grammar rule, the user may associate actions to be Yacc: Yet Another
Compiler-Compiler performed each time the rule is recognized in the input process.
? These actions may return values, and may obtain the values returned by previous
actions. Moreover, the lexical analyzer can return values for tokens, if desired.
? An action is an arbitrary C statement, and as such can do input and output, call
subprograms, and alter external vectors and variables. An action is specified by one
or more statements, enclosed in curly braces ``{'' and ``}''. For example,
A : '(' B ')'
{ hello( 1, "abc" ); }
 
and
XXX : YYY ZZZ
{ printf("a message\n");
flag = 25; }
are grammar rules with actions.
To facilitate easy communication between the actions and the parser, the action
statements are altered slightly. The symbol ``dollar sign'' ``$'' is used as a signal to Yacc in
this context.
To return a value, the action normally sets the pseudo-variable ``$$'' to some value.
For example, an action that does nothing but return the value 1 is
{ $$ = 1; }
To obtain the values returned by previous actions and the lexical analyzer, the action
may use the pseudo-variables $1, $2, . . ., which refer to the values returned by the
components of the right side of a rule, reading from left to right. Thus, if the rule is
A : B C D ;
for example, then $2 has the value returned by C, and $3 the value returned by D.
As a more concrete example, consider the rule
expr : '(' expr ')' ;
The value returned by this rule is usually the value of the expr in parentheses. This
can be indicated by
expr : '(' expr ')' { $$ = $2 ; }
By default, the value of a rule is the value of the first element in it ($1). Thus, grammar
rules of the form
 
A : B ;
frequently need not have an explicit action.
In the examples above, all the actions came at the end of their rules. Sometimes, it is
desirable to get control before a rule is fully parsed. Yacc permits an action to be written in
the middle of a rule as well as at the end.
The user may define other variables to be used by the actions. Declarations and
definitions can appear in the declarations section, enclosed in the marks ``%{'' and ``%}''.
These declarations and definitions have global scope, so they are known to the action
statements and the lexical analyzer. For example,
%{ int variable = 0; %}
could be placed in the declarations section, making variable accessible to all of the
actions. The Yacc parser uses only names beginning in ``yy''; the user should avoid such
names.
In these examples, all the values are integers.
8.3 Lexer
The user must supply a lexical analyzer to read the input stream and communicate
tokens (with values, if desired) to the parser. The lexical analyzer is an integer-valued
function called yylex. The user must supply a lexical analyzer to read the input stream and
communicate tokens (with values, if desired) to the parser. The lexical analyzer is an
integer-valued function called yylex. The parser and the lexical analyzer must agree on these
token numbers in order for communication between them to take place. The numbers may be
chosen by Yacc, or chosen by the user. In either case, the ``# define'' mechanism of C is used
to allow the lexical analyzer to return these numbers symbolically. For example, suppose
that the token name DIGIT has been defined in the declarations section of the Yacc
specification file. The relevant portion of the lexical analyzer might look like:
yylex(){
 
extern int yylval;
int c;
. . .
c = getchar();
. . .
switch( c ) {
. . .
case '0':
case '1':
. . .
case '9':
yylval = c-'0';
return( DIGIT );
. . .
}
. . .
? The intent is to return a token number of DIGIT, and a value equal to the numerical
value of the digit. Provided that the lexical analyzer code is placed in the programs
section of the specification file, the identifier DIGIT will be defined as the token
number associated with the token DIGIT.
 
? This mechanism leads to clear, easily modified lexical analyzers; the only pitfall
is the need to avoid using any token names in the grammar that are reserved or
significant in C or the parser;
? For example, the use of token names ‘if’ or ‘while’ will almost certainly cause
severe difficulties when the lexical analyzer is compiled. The token name error is
reserved for error handling, and should not be used naively.
? The token numbers may be chosen by Yacc or by the user. In the default situation,
the numbers are chosen by Yacc.
? The default token number for a literal character is the numerical value of the character
in the local character set. Other names are assigned token numbers starting at 257.
8.4Compiling and running a SimpleParser:
Yacc turns the specification file into a C program, which parses the input according to the
specification given. The algorithm used to go from the specification to the parser is complex.
however, is relatively simple, and understanding how it works, while not strictly necessary,
will nevertheless make treatment of error recovery and ambiguities much more
comprehensible.
The parser produced by Yacc consists of a finite state machine with a stack. The
parser is also capable of reading and remembering the next input token (called the lookahead
token). The current state is always the one on the top of the stack. The states of the finite
state machine are given small integer labels; initially, the machine is in state 0, the stack
contains only state 0, and no lookahead token has been read.
The machine has only four actions available to it, called shift, reduce, accept, and
error. A move of the parser is done as follows:
1. Based on its current state, the parser decides whether it needs a lookahead token to
decide what action should be done; if it needs one, and does not have one, it calls yylex to
obtain the next token.
 
2. Using the current state, and the lookahead token if needed, the parser decides on its next
action, and carries it out. This may result in states being pushed onto the stack, or popped off
the stack, and in the lookahead token being processed or left alone.
The shift action is the most common action the parser takes. Whenever a shift action is
taken, there is always a lookahead token. For example, in state 56 there may be an action:
IF shift 34
which says, in state 56, if the lookahead token is IF, the current state (56) is pushed
down on the stack, and state 34 becomes the current state (on the top of the stack). The look
ahead token is cleared.
The reduce action keeps the stack from growing without bounds. Reduce actions are
appropriate when the parser has seen the right hand side of a grammar rule, and is
prepared to announce that it has seen an instance of the rule, replacing the right hand side by
the left hand side. It may be necessary to consult the lookahead token to decide whether to
reduce, but usually it is not; in fact, the default action (represented by a ``.'') is often a
reduce action.
Reduce actions are associated with individual grammar rules. Grammar rules are
also given small integer numbers, leading to some confusion. The action
reduce 18
refers to grammar rule 18, while the action
IF shift 34
refers to state 34. Suppose the rule being reduced is
A : x y z ;
The reduce action depends on the left hand symbol (A in this case), and the number
of symbols on the right hand side (three in this case). To reduce, first pop off the top three
states from the stack (In general, the number of states popped equals the number of symbols
on the right side of the rule).
 
In effect, these states were the ones put on the stack while recognizing x, y, and z, and no
longer serve any useful purpose. After popping these states, a state is uncovered which was
the state the parser was in before beginning to process the rule. Using thisuncovered state,
and the symbol on the left side of the rule, perform what is in effect a shift of A. A new state
is obtained, pushed onto the stack, and parsing continues.
The reduce action is also important in the treatment of user-supplied actions and values.
When a rule is reduced, the code supplied with the rule is executed before the stack is
adjusted. In addition to the stack holding the states, another stack, running in parallel
with it, holds the values returnedfrom the lexical analyzer and the actions. When a shift
takes place, the external variable yylval is copied onto the value stack. After the
return from the user code, the reduction is carried out. When the goto action is done, the
external variable yyval is copied onto the value stack. The pseudo-variables $1, $2,
etc., refer to the value stack.
8.5 Arithmetic Expressions and Ambiguity:
A set of grammar rules is ambiguous if there is some input string that can be structured in
two or more different ways. For example, the grammar rule
expr : expr '-' expr
is a natural way of expressing the fact that one way of forming an arithmetic expression is
to put two other expressions together with a minus sign between them. Unfortunately, this
grammar rule does not completely specify the way that all complex inputs should be
structured. For example, if the input is
expr - expr - expr
the rule allows this input to be structured as either
( expr - expr ) - expr
or as
expr - ( expr - expr )
 
(The first is called left association, the second right association).
Yacc detects such ambiguities when it is attempting to build the parser. It is instructive to
consider the problem that confronts the parser when it is given an input such as
expr - expr - expr
When the parser has read the second expr, the input that it has seen:
expr - expr
matches the right side of the grammar rule above. The parser could reduce the input by
applying this rule; after applying the rule; the input is reduced to expr (the left side of the
rule). The parser would then read the final part of the input:
- expr
and again reduce. The effect of this is to take the left associative interpretation.
Alternatively, when the parser has seen
expr - expr
it could defer the immediate application of the rule, and continue reading the input until it
had seen
expr - expr - expr
It could then apply the rule to the rightmost three symbols, reducing them to expr and leaving
expr - expr
Now the rule can be reduced once more; the effect is to take the right associative
interpretation. Thus, having read
expr - expr
The parser can do two legal things, a shift or a reduction, and has no way of
deciding between them. This is called a shift / reduce conflict. It may also happen that the
 
parser has a choice of two legal reductions; this is called a reduce / reduce conflict. Note that
there are never any ``Shift/shift'' conflicts.
When there are shift/reduce or reduce/reduce conflicts, Yacc still produces a parser.
It does this by selecting one of the valid steps wherever it has a choice. A rule describing
which choice to make in a given situation is called a disambiguating rule.
Yacc invokes two disambiguating rules by default:
1. In a shift/reduce conflict, the default is to do the shift.
2. In a reduce/reduce conflict, the default is to reduce by the earlier grammar rule (in the
input sequence).
Rule 1 implies that reductions are deferred whenever there is a choice, in favor of
shifts. Rule 2 gives the user rather crude control over the behavior of the parser in this
situation, but reduce/reduce conflicts should be avoided whenever possible.
Yacc always reports the number of shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts resolved
by Rule 1 and Rule 2.
As an example of the power of disambiguating rules, consider a fragment from a
programming language involving an ``if-then-else'' construction:
stat : IF '(' cond ')' stat
| IF '(' cond ')' stat ELSE stat
;
In these rules, IF and ELSE are tokens, cond is a nonterminal symbol describing
conditional (logical) expressions, and stat is a nonterminal symbol describing statements.
The first rule will be called the simple-if rule, and the second the if-else rule.
These two rules form an ambiguous construction, since input of the form
EXAMPLE:
 
IF ( C1 ) IF ( C2 ) S1 ELSE S2
can be structured according to these rules in two ways:
IF ( C1 ) {
IF ( C2 ) S1
}
ELSE S2
or
IF ( C1 ) {
IF ( C2 ) S1
ELSE S2
}
? The second interpretation is the one given in most programming languages having
this construct. Each ELSE is associated with the last preceding ``un-ELSE'd'' IF. In
this example, consider the situation where the parser has seen
IF ( C1 ) IF ( C2 ) S1
and is looking at the ELSE. It can immediately reduce by the simple-if rule to get
IF ( C1 ) stat
 
and then read the remaining input,
ELSE S2
and reduce
IF ( C1 ) stat ELSE S2
by the if-else rule. This leads to the first of the above groupings of the input.
? On the other hand, the ELSE may be shifted, S2 read, and then the right hand
portion of
IF ( C1 ) IF ( C2 ) S1 ELSE S2
can be reduced by the if-else rule to get
IF ( C1 ) stat
which can be reduced by the simple-if rule.
? Once again the parser can do two valid things - there is a shift/reduce conflict. The
application of disambiguating rule 1 tells the parser to shift in this case, which
leads to the desired grouping.
? This shift/reduce conflict arCSEs only when there is a particular current input
symbol,
ELSE, and particular inputs already seen, such as
IF ( C1 ) IF ( C2 ) S1
? In general, there may be many conflicts, and each one will be associated with an
input symbol and a set of previously read inputs. The previously read inputs are
characterized by the state of the parser.
stat : IF '(' cond ')' stat
? Once again, notice that the numbers following ``shift'' commands refer to other
states, while the numbers following ``reduce'' commands refer to grammar rule
numbers. In the y.output file, the rule numbers are printed after those rules
which can be reduced.
 
8.6 Variables and Typed Tokens
There is one common situation where the rules given above for resolving conflicts are
not sufficient; this is in the parsing of arithmetic expressions. Most of the commonly used
constructions for arithmetic expressions can be naturally described by the notion of
precedence levels for operators, together with information about left or right associatively.
It turns out that ambiguous grammars with appropriate disambiguating rules can be used to
create parsers that are faster and easier to write than parsers constructed from unambiguous
grammars.
? The basic notion is to write grammar rules of the form
expr : expr OP expr
and
expr : UNARY expr
for all binary and unary operators desired. This creates a very ambiguous
grammar, with many parsing conflicts. As disambiguating rules, the user specifies
the precedence, or binding strength, of all the operators, and the associativity of
the binary operators.
? This information is sufficient to allow Yacc to resolve the parsing conflicts in
accordance with these rules, and construct a parser that realizes the desired
precedences and associativities.
? The precedences and associativities are attached to tokens in the declarations
section. This is done by a series of lines beginning with a Yacc keyword: %left,
%right, or %nonassoc, followed by a list of tokens.
? All of the tokens on the same line are assumed to have the same precedence level and
associativity; the lines are listed in order of increasing precedence or binding strength.
Thus,
%left '+' '-'
%left '*' '/'
 
? describes the precedence and associativity of the four arithmetic operators. Plus and
minus are left associative, and have lower precedence than star and slash, which are
also left associative.
? The keyword %right is used to describe right associative operators, and the keyword
%nonassoc is used to describe operators
%right '='
%left '+' '-'
? %left '*' '/'
? %%
? expr : expr '=' expr
o | expr '+' expr
o | expr '-' expr
o | expr '*' expr
o | expr '/' expr
o | NAME
o ;
might be used to structure the input
a = b = c*d - e - f*g
as follows
a = ( b = ( ((c*d)-e) - (f*g) ) )
? When this mechanism is used, unary operators must, in general, be given a
precedence. Sometimes a unary operator and a binary operator have the same
symbolic representation, but different precedences.
o An example is unary and binary '-'; unary minus may be given the same
strength as multiplication, or even higher, while binary minus has a lower
strength than multiplication. The keyword, %prec, changes the precedence
level associated with a particular grammar rule. %prec appears
 
immediately after the body of the grammar rule, before the action or closing
semicolon, and is followed by a token name or literal.
o It causes the precedence of the grammar rule to become that of the following
token name or literal. For example, to make unary minus have the same
precedence as multiplication the rules might resemble:
%left '+' '-'
%left '*' '/'
%%
expr : expr '+' expr
| expr '-' expr
| expr '*' expr
| expr '/' expr
| '-' expr %prec '*'
| NAME
;
A token declared by %left, %right, and %nonassoc need not be, but may be, declared by
%token as well.
The precedence and associatively are used by Yacc to resolve parsing conflicts; they
give rCSE to disambiguating rules. Formally, the rules work as follows:
1. The precedences and associativities are recorded for those tokens and literals that
have them.
 
2. A precedence and associativity is associated with each grammar rule; it is the
precedence and associativity of the last token or literal in the body of the rule. If
the %prec construction is used, it overrides this default. Some grammar rules
may have no precedence and associativity associated with them.
3. When there is a reduce/reduce conflict, or there is a shift/reduce conflict and
either the input symbol or the grammar rule has no precedence and associativity,
then the two disambiguating rules given at the beginning of the section are used,
and the conflicts are reported.
4. If there is a shift/reduce conflict, and both the grammar rule and the input
character have precedence and associativity associated with them, then the
conflict is resolved in favor of the action (shift or reduce) associated with the
higher precedence. If the precedences are the same, then the associativity is
used; left associative implies reduce, right associative implies shift, and
nonassociating implies error.
Conflicts resolved by precedence are not counted in the number of shift/reduce and
reduce/reduce conflicts reported by Yacc. This means that mistakes in the specification of
precedences may disguCSE errors in the input grammar; it is a good idea to be sparing
with
precedences, and use them in an essentially ``cookbook'' fashion, until some experience
has been gained. The y.output file is very useful in deciding whether the parser is actually
doing what was intended.
Recursive rules:
The algorithm used by the Yacc parser encourages so called ``left recursive''
grammar rules: rules of the form
name : name rest_of_rule ;
These rules frequently arCSE when writing specifications of sequences and lists:
 
list : item
| list ',' item
;
and
seq : item
| seq item
;
In each of these cases, the first rule will be reduced for the first item only, and the
second rule will be reduced for the second and all succeeding items.
With right recursive rules, such as
seq : item
| item seq
;
the parser would be a bit bigger, and the items would be seen, and reduced, from right to
left. More seriously, an internal stack in the parser would be in danger of overflowing if a
very long sequence were read. Thus, the user should use left recursion wherever
reasonable.
It is worth considering whether a sequence with zero elements has any meaning, and if
so, consider writing the sequence specification with an empty rule:
seq : /* empty */
| seq item
;
 
Once again, the first rule would always be reduced exactly once, before the first item was
read, and then the second rule would be reduced once for each item read
RUNNING BOTH LEXER AND PARSER:
The yacc program gets the tokens from the lex program. Hence a lex program has be
written to pass the tokens to the yacc. That means we have to follow different procedure
to get the executable file.
i. The lex program <lexfile.l> is fist compiled using lex compiler to get lex.yy.c.
ii. The yacc program <yaccfile.y> is compiled using yacc compiler to get y.tab.c.
iii. Using c compiler b+oth the lex and yacc intermediate files are compiled with the
lex library function. cc y.tab.c lex.yy.c ?ll.
iv. If necessary out file name can be included during compiling with ?o option.
Examples
1. Write a Yacc program to test validity of a simple expression with +, - , /, and *.
/* Lex program that passes tokens */
%{
#include "y.tab.h"
extern int yyparse();
%}
%%
[0-9]+ { return NUM;}
[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z_0-9]* { return IDENTIFIER;}
[+-] {return ADDORSUB;}
[*/] {return PROORDIV;}
[)(] {return yytext[0];}
[\n] {return '\n';}
%%
int main()
{
 
yyparse();
}
/* Yacc program to check for valid expression */
%{
#include<stdlib.h>
extern int yyerror(char * s);
extern int yylex();
%}
%token NUM
%token ADDORSUB
%token PROORDIV
%token IDENTIFIER
%%
input :
| input line
;
line : '\n'
| exp '\n' { printf("valid"); }
| error '\n' { yyerrok; }
;
exp : exp ADDORSUB term
| term
;
term : term PROORDIV factor
| factor
;
factor : NUM
| IDENTIFIER
| '(' exp ')'
;
%%
 
int yyerror(char *s)
{
printf("%s","INVALID\n");
}
/* yacc program that gets token from the c porogram */
%{
#include <stdio.h>
#include <ctype.h>
%}
%token NUMBER LETTER
%left '+' '-'
%left '*' '/'
%%
line:line expr '\n' {printf("\nVALID\n");}
| line '\n'
|
|error '\n' { yyerror ("\n INVALID"); yyerrok;}
;
expr:expr '+' expr
|expr '-' expr
|expr '*'expr
|expr '/' expr
| NUMBER
| LETTER
;
%%
main()
{
yyparse();
 
}
yylex()
{
char c;
while((c=getchar())==' ');
if(isdigit(c)) return NUMBER;
if(isalpha(c)) return LETTER;
return c;
}
yyerror(char *s)
{
printf("%s",s);
}
2. Write a Yacc program to recognize validity of a nested ‘IF’ control statement and
display levels of nesting in the nested if.
/* Lex program to pass tokens */
%{
#include “y.tab.h”
%}
digit [0-9]
num {digit} + (“.” {digit}+)?
binopr [+-/*%^=><&|”= =”| “!=” | “>=” | “<=”
unopr [~!]
char [a-zA-Z_]
id {char}({digit} | {char})*
space [ \t]
 
%%
{space} ;
{num} return num;
{ binopr } return binopr;
{ unopr } return unopr;
{ id} return id
“if” return if
. return yytext[0];
%%
NUMBER {DIGIT}+
/* Yacc program to check for the valid expression */
%{
#include<stdio.h>
int cnt;
%}
%token binopr
%token unop
%token num
%token id
%token if
%%
foo: if_stat { printf(“valid: count = %d\n”, cnt); cnt = 0;
 
exit(0);
}
| error { printf(“Invalid \n”); }
if_stat: token_if ‘(‘ cond ‘)’ comp_stat {cnt++;}
cond: expr
;
expr: sim_exp
| ‘(‘ expr ‘)’
| expr binop factor
| unop factor
;
factor: sim_exp
| ‘(‘ expr ‘)’
;
sim_exp: num
| id
;
sim_stat: expr ‘;’
| if
;
stat_list: sim_stat
 
| stat_list sim_stat
;
comp_stat: sim_stat
| ‘{‘ stat_list ‘}’
;
%%
main()
{
yyparse();
}
yyerror(char *s)
{
printf(“%s\n”, s);
exit(0);
}
3. Write a Yacc program to recognize a valid arithmetic expression that uses +, - , / , *.
%{
#include<stdio.h>
#include <type.h>
%}
 
% token num
% left '+' '-'
% left '*' '/'
%%
st : st expn '\n' {printf ("valid \n"); }
|
| st '\n'
| error '\n' { yyerror ("Invalid \n"); }
;
%%
void main()
{
yyparse (); return 0 ;
}
yylex()
{
char c;
while (c = getch () ) == ' ')
if (is digit (c))
return num;
 
return c;
}
yyerror (char *s)
{
printf("%s", s);
}
4. Write a yacc program to recognize an valid variable which starts with letter followed
by a digit. The letter should be in lowercase only.
/* Lex program to send tokens to the yacc program */
%{
#include "y.tab.h"
%}
%%
[0-9] return digit;
[a-z] return letter;
[\n] return yytext[0];
. return 0;
%%
/* Yacc program to validate the given variable */
 
%{
#include<type.h>
%}
% token digit letter ;
%%
ident : expn '\n' { printf ("valid\n"); exit (0); }
;
expn : letter
| expn letter
| expn digit
| error { yyerror ("invalid \n"); exit (0); }
;
%%
main()
{
yyparse();
}
yyerror (char *s)
{
printf("%s", s);
 
}
/* Yacc program which has c program to pass tokens */
%{
#include <stdio.h>
#include <ctype.h>
%}
%token LETTER DIGIT
%%
st:st LETTER DIGIT '\n' {printf("\nVALID");}
| st '\n'
|
| error '\n' {yyerror("\nINVALID");yyerrok;}
;
%%
main()
{
yyparse();
}
yylex()
{
char c;
while((c=getchar())==' ');
if(islower(c)) return LETTER;
if(isdigit(c)) return DIGIT;
return c;
}
 
yyerror(char *s)
{
printf("%s",s);
}
5.Write a yacc program to evaluate an expression (simple calculator program).
/* Lex program to send tokens to the Yacc program */
%{
#include" y.tab.h"
expern int yylval;
%}
%%
[0-9] digit
char[_a-zA-Z]
id {char} ({ char } | {digit })*
%%
{digit}+ {yylval = atoi (yytext);
return num;
}
{id} return name
[ \t] ;
\n return 0;
. return yytext [0];
 
%%
/* Yacc Program to work as a calculator */
%{
#include<stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
%}
% token num name
% left '+' '-'
% left '*' '/'
% left unaryminus
%%
st : name '=' expn
| expn { printf ("%d\n" $1); }
;
expn : num { $$ = $1 ; }
| expn '+' num { $$ = $1 + $3; }
| expn '-' num { $$ = $1 - $3; }
| expn '*' num { $$ = $1 * $3; }
| expn '/' num { if (num == 0)
{ printf ("div by zero \n");
 
exit (0);
}
else
{ $$ = $1 / $3; }
| '(' expn ')' { $$ = $2; }
;
%%
main()
{
yyparse();
}
yyerror (char *s)
{
printf("%s", s);
}
5. Write a yacc program to recognize the grammar { anb for n >= 0}.
/* Lex program to pass tokens to yacc program */
%{
#include "y.tab.h"
%}
[a] { return a ; printf("returning A to yacc \n"); }
 
[b] return b
[\n] return yytex[0];
. return error;
%%
/* Yacc program to check the given expression */
%{
#include<stdio.h>
%}
% token a b error
%%
input : line
| error
;
line : expn '\n' { printf(" valid new line char \n"); }
;
expn : aa expn bb
| aa
;
aa : aa a
 
| a
;
bb : bb b
| b
;
error : error { yyerror ( " " ) ; }
%%
main()
{
yyparse();
}
yyerror (char *s)
{
printf("%s", s);
}
/* Yacc to evaluate the expression and has c program for tokens */
%{
/* 6b.y {A^NB N >=0} */
#include <stdio.h>
 
%}
%token A B
%%
st:st reca endb '\n' {printf("String belongs to grammar\n");}
| st endb '\n' {printf("String belongs to grammar\n");}
| st '\n'
| error '\n' {yyerror ("\nDoes not belong to grammar\n");yyerrok;}
|
;
reca: reca enda | enda;
enda:A;
endb:B;
%%
main()
{
yyparse();
}
yylex()
{
char c;
while((c=getchar())==' ');
if(c=='a')
return A;
if(c=='b')
return B;
return c;
}
yyerror(char *s)
{
fprintf(stdout,"%s",s);
}
 
7. Write a program to recognize the grammar { anbn | n >= 0 }
/* Lex program to send tokens to yacc program */
%{
#include "y.tab.h"
%}
[a] {return A ; printf("returning A to yacc \n"); }
[b] return B
[\n] return yytex[0];
. return error;
%%
/* yacc program that evaluates the expression */
%{
#include<stdio.h>
%}
% token a b error
%%
input : line
| error
 
;
line : expn '\n' { printf(" valid new line char \n"); }
;
expn : aa expn bb
|
;
error : error { yyerror ( " " ) ; }
%%
main()
{
yyparse();
}
yyerror (char *s)
{
printf("%s", s);
}
/* Yacc program which has its own c program to send tokens */
%{
/* 7b.y {A^NB^N N >=0} */
 
#include <stdio.h>
%}
%token A B
%%
st:st reca endb '\n' {printf("String belongs to grammar\n");}
| st '\n' {printf("N value is 0,belongs to grammar\n");}
|
| error '\n'
{yyerror ("\nDoes not belong to grammar\n");yyerrok;}
;
reca: enda reca endb | enda;
enda:A;
endb:B;
%%
main()
{
yyparse();
}
yylex()
{
char c;
while((c=getchar())==' ');
if(c=='a')
return A;
if(c=='b')
return B;
return c;
}
yyerror(char *s)
{
fprintf(stdout,"%s",s);
 
}
8. Write a Yacc program t identify a valid IF statement or IF-THEN-ELSE statement.
/* Lex program to send tokens to yacc program */
%{
#include "y.tab.h"
%}
CHAR [a-zA-Z0-9]
%x CONDSTART
%%
<*>[ ] ;
<*>[ \t\n]+ ;
<*><<EOF>> return 0;
if return(IF);
else return(ELSE);
then return(THEN);
\( {BEGIN(CONDSTART);return('(');}
<CONDSTART>{CHAR}+ return COND;
<CONDSTART>\) {BEGIN(INITIAL);return(')');}
{CHAR}+ return(STAT) ;
%%
/* Yacc program to check for If and IF Then Else statement */
%{
#include<stdio.h>
%}
 
%token IF COND THEN STAT ELSE
%%
Stat:IF '(' COND ')' THEN STAT {printf("\n VALId Statement");}
| IF '(' COND ')' THEN STAT ELSE STAT {printf("\n VALID Statement");}
|
;
%%
main()
{
printf("\n enter statement ");
yyparse();
}
yyerror (char *s)
{
printf("%s",s);
}
/* Yacc program that has c program to send tokens */
%{
#include <stdio.h>
#include <ctype.h>
%}
%token if simple
% noassoc reduce
% noassoc else
%%
 
start : start st ‘\n’
|
;
st : simple
| if_st
;
if_st : if st %prec reduce { printf (“simple\n”); }
| if st else st {printf (“if_else \n”); }
;
%%
int yylex()
{
int c;
c = getchar();
switch ( c )
{
case ‘i’ : return if;
case ‘s’ : return simple;
case ‘e’ : return else;
default : return c;
}
 
}
main ()
{
yy parse();
}
yyerror (char *s)
{
printf("%s", s);
}

Editors




You might like this video:Watch more here

Watch more videos from this user Here

Learn how to upload a video over here